Can “the most disturbing internet craze yet” Be Used For PR?


The emergence of Chat Roulette earlier this year was one that intrigued and appalled in equal measure. The site works by randomly connecting two users by video-chat, with each user allowed to hit next and move on to a new partner at any moment. It became known chiefly for attracting weirder types which, among some, provoked outrage. However, the popularity of the site has also led to some moments of creativity, my favourite being ‘Merton’.

With a large amount of press coverage and such a high level of usage (especially among teenagers), the potential for marketing activity seemed great. But relatively few brands have picked up on the site, I suspect, mainly due to it’s risqué associations.

The first brand to attempt to use the technology was French Connection, who challenged male users to ‘chat up’ women with the promise of a £250 voucher if successful. The campaign, being the first of its kind, guaranteed the brand column inches at a time when Chat Roulette was much discussed. Also, the pairing wasn’t all that surprising, given that the brand’s most famous campaign was to rename themselves FCUK. A more recent example is Coca Cola, who used the tool as part of their latest campaign for Dr Pepper. On April Fool’s Day, they got a cheerleader to ask users to do more and more ridiculous things before replacing the cheerleader with a middle-aged, semi-naked man and then revealing the brand logo with a Happy April Fool’s Day message.

Chat Roulette clearly has its limits as a marketing tool. But Coca Cola have shown that it can be used best by creating funny videos that are then likely to go viral. By using the medium creatively, with good humour and even slyly referencing the one thing Chat Roulette made headlines for, Coca Cola have been able to create content that is likely to be passed on and gain column inches. It’ll be interesting to see which other brands approach the technology and what new ways they devise of using the medium.

About the Author

Paul Barnett

Paul Barnett

Paul Barnett is a Social Media Analyst for Social Media Library, responsible for developing the content within Social Media Library. Paul lives in a world of blogs, blogs and more blogs, scouring the web and plucking out the juiciest information he finds. Previous to this, he worked as a Music Press Officer. He is also a freelance writer, an organiser of Scrabble Sunday and blogs about stuff that he does here.




Back Of The Net! Pizza Hut Ireland Scores A (Legitimate) Social Media Goal


Here at Social Media Library, we’re big fans of Pizza Hut’s new social media campaign in Ireland. They promise to give away a free pizza to the first 350 customers who order a pizza using a code from their Facebook page that appears when a goal is scored against France in the World Cup. Non-football lovers might be confused as to the company’s apparent anti-France sentiment. However, Ireland were beaten to a place in the World Cup by France courtesy of a goal, which involved the hand (twice!) of France’s Thierry Henry, leading to a somewhat France-loathing and definitely-seething nation of Irish football fans. (As an aside, I’m an Arsenal fan so believe that the goal was perfectly valid…ahem!).

Pizza Hut 1 France 0

Pizza Hut 1 France 0

Anyway, here are the reasons why the campaign works for me:

1. It’s topical – Timed to coincide with the start of the World Cup, the media will be dominated by the event and public interest will be high, so latching onto that is a definite good thing for Pizza Hut.

2. It’s funny – A bit of football banter never hurt anyone and Pizza Hut are taking advantage of that and uniting behind the common Irish enemy – France! Also, it allows them to put the boot in subtly, yet with light humour when they release quotes like ”How many pizzas are given away really depends on the French performance, which isn’t great at the moment”.

3. It has wide appeal – During events like the World Cup, people tend to take more of an interest in football than normal, so all-pervading is its reach. The chance to unite against the enemy in this way is bound to capture the imagination.

4. Pizza and football are good bedfellows – Whilst it may be a relatively new idea, the concept of getting together to watch the football with some beers and a pizza works well.

5. National pride – Although Ireland can’t get behind their team, they can unite and show their national pride by cheering on whoever plays France.

6. Free stuff – Any campaign that promises free stuff, especially something as coveted as pizza, on this scale is good by me.

7. Increases number of Facebook fans – By clicking on the Like button on the Facebook page, you’ll receive an update when a goal is scored against France. This increases the spread of the campaign and drives more people to the Facebook page, which is good news for future campaigns.

8. Press – Points 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 means that there will be sufficient interest for the campaign to achieve good press coverage.

Campaigns like this prove that social media can be used simply and effectively with a small amount of creativity, awareness of your market and current events. I really fancy a pizza right now….

About the Author

Paul Barnett

Paul Barnett

Paul Barnett is a Social Media Analyst for Social Media Library, responsible for developing the content within Social Media Library. Paul lives in a world of blogs, blogs and more blogs, scouring the web and plucking out the juiciest information he finds. Previous to this, he worked as a Music Press Officer. He is also a freelance writer, an organiser of Scrabble Sunday and blogs about stuff that he does here.




Is The UK Lagging Behind The US In Social Media?


It is no secret that the US has a tradition of forward thinking marketing attitude. Al Ries and Seth Godin, big names in marketing dissidence come from there. Equally, big names in Social Media also come from the US. In addition, Social Media usage remains bigger in the US, with the cities of New York City and San Francisco having mindblowing rates of Twitter and Facebook activity.

Consequently, companies are embracing Social Media at different rates. I’d like to bring up Levis as a mandatory example. If you head to Levis in the US, you will find a clean website dominated by the Facebook Like button. Not only can you browse trousers (and buy them) but also there is an easy way of voting for which ones you like best with the Like button. As I have discussed here, a site that caters to a young audience benefits from the playfulness of the Like button at a usability level. But also, the Like button improves the NFO ( News Feed Optimisation ), increases visits to the site from Facebook and also makes decisions easier with a slant of social proof ( I am more prone to buy the trousers that most people like). The list of benefits is countless, especially after the official release of powerful Facebook analytics yesterday.

Levis US website

Levis' US website

Head back to British soil. The experience is different. You are fobbed off with countless Flash videos and slideshows, music and garish interactivity. It takes me minutes to find the stock with “Flash loading page” and music clips (music on a website, really?). And of course, no trace of Facebook functionality or even Social Media buttons.

I can foresee people arguing that users prefer aesthetic websites and that these websites send a message of “cool and trendy” to the users (true in 2004, no doubt). I wonder then why such an uncool (and yet supercool) website such as Facebook accounts for 55 minutes of daily use of the average British internet user. I also wonder why companies keep thinking we’d rather watch clips and blatant brand advertising than our friend’s opinion on trousers we may buy.

In a nutshell, kudos to US Levis for recreating the experience of shopping with friends. And a few tips as a conclusion:

1) Flash is an animation programme. It has no place in web development. It is heavy, slow, unshareable and needlessly whacky.
2) Message control is bad. Users don’t trust and filter out marketing messages that come 100% from a corporate source. Allowing users to air their opinions is good for a company since it produces invaluable input.
3) Facebook plugins are great because they increase your presence in the most populated social network there is and drives visits back to your site from there.

What do you think?

About The Author

Xavi Izaguirre

Xavi Izaguirre

Xavier Izaguirre joined Social Media Library as a Social Media Analyst, helping brands and agencies identify key influencers online and devising best outreach strategies. With a background in traditional marcoms, Xavier has also completed a Masters Degree in Marketing and Communications at Westminster University, London and carries out social media and online marketing consultancy work as a freelancer.

Follow Xavier on Twitter at @Xavi_izaguirre




Misadventures In Social Media: The Orlando Office Of Emergency Management


Social media can be a powerful tool for disseminating information, a veritable godsend for authorities to contact people… assuming people know the information is there. Let’s review a brief and abridged history;

2005: Hurricane Katrina, NOLA.com (website of the Times-Picayune newspaper, serving New Orleans) and the Biloxi-based Sun Herald legitimised online journalism by receiving the first Pulitzer Prizes awarded to websites for ‘providing a lifeline for devastated readers, in print and online, during their time of greatest need.’ Blogs somehow updated from within New Orleans kept the mainstream media honest. This legitimised the internet as an emergency management tool.

2007: Wildfires in San Diego County, California are tracked by journalists for KPBS San Diego, who were applauded for their efforts to keep residents informed. The Google map that provided a visual guide to the fires is still online.

2010: Twitter proved itself as an Emergency Management tool following the Haitian earthquake, local personalities such as radio and television host Carel Pedre were twittering away, sending short bursts of important information out both to the wider world and the locals who needed it most. Most importantly to this article, it shows the value of mobile internet.

So, social media works in emergencies – the newspaper websites and blogs of Katrina have moved over to include the more immediate Twitter, broadcasting breaking news across the world in real-time. The problem with using Twitter to keep affected people informed is that if they don’t know you’re doing it they may not get the message; the golden rule of social media is visibility.

Visibility: Youre welcome, Orlando

Visibility: You're welcome, Orlando

This is the situation that the city of Orlando, Florida, is facing as the 2010 Atlantic Hurricane Season begins. Rolling out just twelve days earlier, the City of Orlando Fire Department Office of Emergency Management’s (OEM) Twitter (@orlOEM) boasted 26 followers as the season opened on June 1st. One week in, and they’ve increased their stock to 40 followers and a timeline averaging a single tweet a week.

I almost followed it until I realised it’d screw up my numbers.

I almost followed it until I realised it’d screw up my numbers.

Only one online source even mentioned the account at launch, the Orlando Sentinal, in an article published the day before the season began. The same publication warns on its homepage that ‘Major hurricanes [are] more likely during busy seasons,’ such as the one forecast for this year. With just a few dozen followers, little fanfare, and a hasty release, anyone might think this was a token effort from a town hall that claims, in their own social media guidelines, to want ‘to maintain a moderated online discussion.’ Yet even with this air of tokenism, the OEM intends to roll out a complementary facebook account.

Compare this to the Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (@GOHSEP). The account is currently focused on the Oil Spill (you may have possibly heard about it and can read our view on it here) but is legally bound to answer all questions fielded, providing an interesting and constantly moving timeline full of @ messages and announcements. The office considers their 2,052 followers to be low but, as Jennifer Valentino-DeVries over at the WSJ reports, they’re ‘concentrating on responding to people and getting its message out to others who will retweet it. Often, if someone asks a contentious question via Twitter, the staff will take the conversation to Twitter’s private “direct message” system.’ Christina Stephens (the GOHSEP director of communications) gets Twitter.

Michael McCarthy (the City of Orlando’s creative-services manager and social media editor) doesn’t. It’s bad enough for an Office of Emergency Management in a place that tends to get walloped by hurricanes to only have 40 followers – but its just embarrassing to consider that the New York OEM’s announcement of hurricane season was seen by six times as many people. Keep in mind that hurricanes tend to reach NY as gentle breezes and drizzle.

McCarthy would be wise to look at Louisiana’s social media strategy and ask the neighbours for advice; Walt Disney World’s official Twitter account has accumulated over 62,000 followers – that could be one hell of a retweet. Why not simply ask for one? Unless of course there’s been some sort of falling out between the area and the company responsible for driving most of the region’s tourism, which seems unlikely.

These followers are undoubtedly not all locals, but Disney is a remarkably strong presence in the area’s employment and a strong local brand. The local NBA team, and only major professional sports team in the city, the Orlando Magic broadcasts tweets out to over a million followers. McCarthy could use a piece of that action. Once again, these followers will be from diverse areas – but all will have some connection with Orlando (even if it is just liking their jersey colours – which is understandable) and can potentially use this connection to spread the message out even further. It’s often said that important or interesting information will get retweeted, but if you’re the government who helped to fund a stadium, and would be tasked with cleaning up its debris after a hurricane, I’m pretty sure etiquette dictates you can just go ahead and ask for one.

Think of it like a Twitter-based protection racket. Also, nice colours!

Think of it like a Twitter-based protection racket. Also, nice colours!

This is one of the basic fundamentals of Twitter – get retweeted, get exposure, get followers. A single re-tweet from the official Disney or Magic accounts would undoubtedly increase followers substantially, increasing the effectiveness of the OEM account. After all, what’s the point of a governmental social media campaign if you’re not going to do it properly?

It’s still early days for the OEM social media campaign – most weather based information services don’t rapidly increase in popularity until the weather is rapidly increasing in proximity, and the more traditional emergency warning system already in place works terrifyingly well (weathermen there can tell you the exact time a tropical storm will end while its hitting you; weathermen here barely seem to know what day it is). Equally, hurricanes don’t exactly lend themselves well to sneak attacks – you’re going to know one way or another if one’s on the way. So, maybe I’m overestimating the impact of social media. Maybe social media just isn’t the priority for the Orlando OEM… or maybe they just straight up don’t get Twitter, which is a shame considering these words from Christina Stephens:

“During an evacuation, people don’t have access to computers, but they can get Facebook on their mobile phone. They’re going to use that interface to get information.”

Twitter is more phone-friendly than Facebook, more easily navigated and accessible. By neglecting to properly publicise their account the Orlando OEM is failing in its own commitment to ‘prepar[e] and [inform] all city residents and businesses,’ and hurting its own effectiveness in the event of a devastating landfall. Time will tell.

About The Author

David Shawcross is an Intern for Social Media Library. He has a Degree in History and Politics from the University of Reading.




Turning To Social Media To Vent Anger Against BP


The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico made headlines on April 20th, 2010 as the largest offshore spill in US history. Understandably this has had a disastrous effect on BP’s brand image, which is now one of environmental irresponsibility. Social media played a key part in further tarnishing BP, when a parody Twitter account @BPGlobalPR began tweeting amusing tweets designed to make BP look like a company that doesn’t take the Gulf disaster seriously or care about those affected.

@BPGlobalPRs Twitter Account

@BPGlobalPR's Twitter Account

@BPGlobalPR’s ultimate aim is to raise awareness and sell T-shirts featuring the slogan ‘BP Cares’, donating all proceeds to www.healthygulf.org, a charity drive to help clean up the oil spill. However, the use of humour for such a serious subject has been controversial, with some of its followers failing to recognise it as a parody. The site caused such anger among the public that some followers even left death threats.

BP, already under fierce public criticism for the oil spill, will see the Twitter hack as a disaster for their brand as, essentially, they are letting someone from outside the company represent them.

@BPGlobalPR’s popularity has soared and now has 10 times more followers then BP’s real Twitter account. However, BP itself has also benefited from the publicity generated through this site and has seen the biggest sustained rise in followers after the fake account launched.

Twitter Usage

Increase Of Twitter Followers

But what should BP do? Embrace the account or demand a ban?

Initial thoughts would be that it could be best to ban @BPGlobalPR. But would a ban really make people see BP in a new light or would it make them look like a company who can’t take a joke? If they were to ban @BPGlobalPR,  the public and media could well take the view that they’d be ruining the parody site’s charity efforts, cue further backlash.

Could social media help save BP’s brand image?

The public are understandably frustrated about the situation and the fake account gives them a platform to express and work out their frustrations away from the authentic BP site. BP could take advantage of this and make what was initially a negative attack work for them. If BP collaborated with @BPGlobalPR they could turn www.healthygulf.org into a national charity campaign, which could help to turn their PR image around. They could also take advantage of its vast numbers of followers and use it as a platform to get their real messages across to a larger audience then their own site would allow.

This is not the only way that social media has been used to vent anger against BP. “Black Oil Firefox Plug-in” is a Firefox application that has been created byJess3, the Washington D.C.-based web design, branding and data visualization agency and is designed to black out any mention of BP or the oil spill on Firefox browsers.

Social media gives the public a platform to protest, allowing them to express their views and vent anger in ways which traditional media would not allow. These campaigns certainly have an impact on the public but whether they will make a difference or have a big enough impact to really impact BP operations remains to be seen.

About The Author

Gemma Uthayakumar is an Intern for Social Media Library. She has a Masters in Research Methods and Statistics from City University.




« Newer PostsOlder Posts »